|
|
A Market Divided
Econoday Simply
Economics 2/28/00
By Evelina M. Tainer, Chief Economist |
Greenspan
has his say, again
Greenspan addressed the Senate Banking Committee this past week in the
second installment of the Humphrey-Hawkins testimony. He didn't really
say anything new compared to his remarks the previous week. But even the
fact that he repeated them did not go over well with the markets.
Equity investors
were not all that thrilled with Greenspan's remarks a week ago when
he indicated that stock prices were going to have to rise on par with
income growth - about 6 percent a year. That's a far cry from the long-term
average growth rate of roughly 11 percent a year for equities. Investors
in the industrial sector are taking Greenspan at his word. The initial
Fed tightening that began last year didn't really sink in with investors
at first. This year's rate hike, with the promise of more to come, is
scaring investors in those cyclical and interest-sensitive industries.
Investors in the technology market appear to be unconcerned. After all,
how badly can even 50 or 75 basis points hurt the market when the returns
in high tech stocks are out of this world?
The NASDAQ composite
index rose 174.9 points this week and is 12.8 percent above year-end
levels. The Russell 2000 -- the primary index of small-capitalization
stocks - is rising as well, although at a slightly slower rate than
the NASDAQ. The Russell is up 11.1 points this week, and 10.3 percent
above year-end levels.
The Dow Jones Industrials
plunged this week - and even managed to pass the psychological 10,000
mark, on the down side. This blue chip index is now 14.2 percent below
year-end levels and stands at its lowest since April 1999. Interesting
tidbit: In four of the past five Fridays, the Dow has fallen more than
200 points. The S&P 500 is laden with tech stocks, but that is not preventing
the index from following the Dow Industrials on the lower track. The
S&P 500 fell 13.4 points this week and is 9.3 percent lower than year-end.
Treasury
market in a quandary
Treasury prices - and by definition, yields - were all over the place
this week. The plunge in the stock market led to a flight-to-quality
run for short-term Treasury securities helping to lower yields. Also
helping, crude oil prices rose to about $30 per barrel - and this boosted
yields on the 30-year bond. The Treasury yield curve remains inverted.
Before the change in projected borrowing needs by the Treasury, an inverted
yield curve had signaled an economic slowdown. Perhaps, it may still
signal a moderation in economic activity, but that effect is swamped
by supply issues. Until this gets sorted out, Treasury yields may reveal
less about economic fundamentals and more about hedging and short-term
liquidity forces.
Markets
at a Glance
|
Treasury
Securities |
12/31/99 |
Feb
18 |
Feb
25 |
Weekly
Change |
30-year Bond |
6.48% |
6.16% |
6.15% |
- 1 BP |
10-year Note
|
6.43% |
6.49% |
6.34% |
- 15 BP |
5-year Note |
6.34% |
6.68% |
6.49% |
- 19 BP |
2-year Note |
6.24% |
6.63% |
6.42% |
- 21 BP |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Prices |
|
|
|
|
DJIA |
11497* |
10221* |
9862* |
- 3.5 % |
S&P 500 |
1469* |
1347* |
1333* |
- 1.0% |
NASDAQ Composite |
4069* |
4416* |
4591* |
+ 4.0% |
Russell 2000 |
505* |
546* |
557* |
+ 2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
Rates |
|
|
|
|
Euro/$ |
1.0008 |
0.9854 |
0.9745 |
- 1.1% |
Yen/$ |
102.40 |
110.96 |
110.46 |
- 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
Prices |
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil ($/barrel) |
$25.60 |
$29.50 |
$30.45 |
+ 3.2% |
Gold ($/ounce) |
$289.60 |
$307.10 |
$294.70 |
- 4.0% |
(BP = basis points;
stock price indices are rounded)
GDP
growth revised higher for Q4
Real GDP grew at a whopping 6.9 percent rate in the fourth quarter of
1999, 1.1 percentage points faster than the initial estimate reported
a month ago. Most categories were higher, with the largest upward revisions
in consumption expenditures and net exports. The first quarter of 1998
saw an equally large gain in GDP growth, but these kinds of increases
are atypical. There is no hiding the fact (from Fed policy-makers) that
economic activity has been robust the last few years. On a fourth quarter-to-fourth
quarter basis, real GDP has expanded more than 4 percent for four straight
years! Fed officials have come to the realization that the economy can
grow more rapidly than the old days, but it still needs to see GDP growth
in the neighborhood of 3 to 3 ½%, not 4 to 4 ½%.
Personal consumption
expenditures grew at a 5.9 percent rate in the fourth quarter, surpassing
the pace for the middle two quarters of the year, but not quite as robust
as the January-to-March (1999) period. A spurt in durable goods spending
helped propel the figure, but spending on nondurable goods was pretty
healthy too.
Business fixed investment
moderated significantly during the quarter as declines in nonresidential
structures partially offset modest gains in capital equipment and software.
The recent uptick in nondefense capital goods orders suggests that this
sector could see some acceleration of growth in the first half of 2000
Residential investment
increased at an anemic 1 percent rate, offsetting only a small portion
of the drop posted in the third quarter. There is no getting around
the fact that housing activity hit a boil about mid-year 1999. Housing
activity is still percolating at a high level, but is moderating. Higher
mortgage rates have curtailed activity to some extent.
Net exports deteriorated
sharply in the fourth quarter, but less than the initial estimate showed.
Exports grew at a 8.7 percent rate in the fourth quarter, continuing
the trend set earlier this year of more pronounced quarterly gains.
Imports grew at a 10 percent rate - healthy, but at a slower pace than
earlier in the year.
A surge in government
expenditures in the fourth quarter rounded out this quarter. It is likely
that Y2K provisions spurred the rise in federal defense and nondefense
outlays. Analysts don't expect these kinds of increases to be sustained.
The GDP deflator
rose at a 2 percent rate in the fourth quarter, unchanged from the advance
estimate. This growth is faster than the middle two quarters of the
year, but largely reflects a spurt in energy prices. The PCE (personal
consumption expenditure) deflator rose at a 2.5 percent rate - also
unchanged from the initial report. This is the series Greenspan favors
over the CPI since it reflects changes in the composition of spending
as well as changes in prices. While the deflator accelerated from a
quarter ago, the bulk of the gain came from higher energy prices.
The
bottom-line on growth? Getting worried about fourth quarter
GDP growth seems silly as we end the month of February. After all, that
was ages ago! Yet, the figures suggest strong momentum in economic activity
that won't be stopped on a dime. That could mean that the Fed's tightening
policy has only just begun. The data pretty much confirm what Greenspan
mentioned at his recent Humphrey-Hawkins testimony. Inflation is not
yet a problem. But the more growth exceeds its path, and the longer
it does so, the greater the risks of inflation. Yes, fourth quarter
GDP is old news, but it's not irrelevant to Fed officials.
Housing
activity, first sign of cracking?
Existing home sales plunged 10.7 percent in January to a 4.59 million-unit
rate. This put sales 10 percent below year ago levels and at their lowest
rate since January 1998! Sales should always be viewed with caution
in winter months, particularly January. Yet, the drop in sales wasn't
concentrated in the Northeast or the Midwest regions of the country
that can be snowbound. Instead, the biggest decline among the four regions
came from the West - where sales nose-dived 27.3 percent for the month!
The South and West regions of the country contribute more to monthly
sales relative to the more mature Northeast and Midwest regions.
Whether the January
level will be revised away next month isn't all that important. The
chart below shows that sales have indeed moderated dramatically in the
past several months - in tandem with rising mortgage rates. In February,
the 30-year fixed mortgage rate stood at 8.33 percent - its highest
level since mid-1996. Even if the decline in January home sales is overstated,
the data does suggest that housing activity peaked last summer and is
headed for a slowdown.
The
bottom-line on housing? Existing home sales dropped sharply
in January, but even if one is less inclined to believe that housing
demand could have declined so precipitously in one month, there is no
question that home sales peaked last summer. Higher mortgage rates are
slowly but surely dampening demand. Eventually, this translates into
slower retail sales as the need for new furniture and appliances diminishes.
Fed officials are likely to be reassured by these figures - although
it won't prevent the Fed from raising rates again at the March FOMC
meeting.
Durable
goods healthy despite January dip
New orders for manufacturers' durable goods fell 1.3 percent in January
after a whopping 6.3 percent hike in December. Don't be misled by the
January dip into thinking that this sector is winding down. Indeed,
both months were affected by volatile aircraft orders in the defense
component. Nondefense capital goods are picking up steam as indicated
in the chart below. The data shown reflects a three-month moving average
of new durable orders and nondefense orders and this is compared to
the period for three months earlier.
The
bottom-line on manufacturing activity? For the most part,
industrial production and new orders were not enjoying the same robust
pace of growth that was evident in the consumer sector in the first
part of 1999. At the end of 1999, new orders picked up steam and this
momentum will carry forward into 2000. These figures support stronger
gains for industrial production. Until now, employment in the manufacturing
sector was very soggy - posting monthly declines for more than one year.
We haven't seen a real turnaround in factory payrolls yet. Federal Reserve
officials may not be encouraged about the pick up in manufacturing activity
- and could worry that this will increase labor demand further in one
sector that previously saw declining labor demand.
THE
BOTTOM LINE
Alan Greenspan managed to take the wind out of the sails of the blue
chip sector, but tech stocks keep chugging along. The drop in stock
prices - as measured by the Dow Jones Industrials - is not going to
be enough to prevent the Fed from raising rates in March and possibly
again in May. After all, not all stock markets are moving in tandem.
It will take more than one down index to scare consumers out of spending.
GDP news was old
news but still revealed strong momentum going into this year. While
the manufacturing sector is improving (durable goods orders), the housing
market may be moderating as the impact of higher mortgage rates finally
takes effect.
Market players are
going to become more skittish than ever in the next few weeks. Next
week brings everyone's favorite indicator - the employment situation.
It will set the tone for the month. But market players will get more
nervous as we approach mid-month and the next FOMC meeting in which
the Fed is likely to raise the fed funds target another 25 basis points.
Looking
Ahead: Week of February 28 to March 3
Market News International compiles this market consensus which surveys
about 20 economists every week.
Monday
Market players are looking for an increase of 0.7 percent in personal
income for January. This would be a sharp acceleration from
the two previous months and incorporates annual cost-of-living increases
for social security recipients and federal government workers in addition
to healthy wages and salaries. Based on the retail sales figures, economists
are predicting that personal consumption expenditures
will rise 0.3 percent in January, less than the 0.8 percent gain recorded
in December.
Tuesday
The Conference Board's consumer confidence
index is expected to edge down to 143.5 in February from
January's record level of 144.7. Inflation and employment conditions
remain favorable, but consumers may start feeling the pinch of the declining
stock market. Tuesday The Conference Board's consumer confidence index
is expected to edge down to 143.5 in February from January's record
level of 144.7. Inflation and employment conditions remain favorable,
but consumers may start feeling the pinch of the declining stock market.
The Chicago
Purchasing Managers' Survey is expected to rise to 56.5 in
February from a level of 55.6 in January. The Chicago index is widely
followed because it tends to predict changes in the NAPM.
Wednesday
Economists are predicting the NAPM survey
will inch higher in February to 56.5. The NAPM composite index itself
is taking second place to the prices paid component. In January, the
price index had jumped more than four points to 72.6. Prices continue
to be a key element of concern among financial market players.
The market consensus
calls for a 0.4 percent gain in construction
spending in January. Expenditures rose 2 percent in each
of the previous two months.
Thursday
Market participants are expecting new jobless
claims to rise 5,000 in the week ended February 26 from last
week's 278,000 level.
The consensus shows
that the Conference Board's index of leading
indicators should edge up 0.3 percent in January after larger
gains the previous few months. As long as the index continues to rise,
it isn't signaling any signs of downturn.
New
home sales are predicted to decline 1.1 percent in January
to an 890,000 unit rate. Often, new home sales and existing home sales
move in the same direction, if not by the same magnitude. Existing home
sales plunged nearly 11 percent in January.
Friday
Economists are predicting that nonfarm payroll
employment will rise 225,000 in February after a 387,000
gain in January. The January hike was attributed to favorable weather
conditions; the same could be said for February. These are not the kind
of increases that will endear themselves to Fed officials and market
players who fear an aggressive rate hike policy. The civilian
unemployment rate is expected to remain unchanged at 4 percent.
Average hourly earnings should
rise 0.3 percent in February, a bit less than last month. Economists
are predicting the average workweek
will remain unchanged at 34.6 hours.
The market consensus
shows that factory orders will decline
0.5 percent in January after December's robust gain of 3.3 percent.
This reflects the smaller-than-expected drop in advance durable goods
orders.
|