|
|
Consumers
take breather
Econoday Simply
Economics 6/19/00
By Evelina M. Tainer, Chief Economist |
Much ado about nothing
Once again, the weekly stock price movements
can be summarized as mild this week – except for the sharp drop in the
Dow Jones Industrials on Friday. Worries about bank stocks led the index
down after Wachovia Bank warned that upcoming earnings would be weaker
than expected. This hurt bank stocks in a big way on both Thursday and
Friday. Otherwise, the Russell 2000 was the only major stock index to
remain above year-end levels. The Dow and the NASDAQ composite are still
six to ten percent under water for the year. The S&P 500 is only
0.3 percent below year-end levels.
Sluggish
economic news leads to bond market rally
For the most part, economic news was weaker
than expected – particularly those indicators related to the consumer.
Between declines in retail sales and housing starts, bond investors
were beginning to feel much more comfortable that the end of the tightening
cycle may be in sight. Hawkish comments by Fed governors were practically
ignored. By week’s end a sharp drop in the Dow also helped bond yields
to rally.
Markets at a Glance
|
Treasury
Securities |
12/31/99
|
June
9
|
June
16
|
Weekly
Change
|
30-year Bond |
6.48%
|
5.90%
|
5.87%
|
- 3 BP
|
10-year Note |
6.43%
|
6.13%
|
5.97%
|
- 16 BP
|
5-year Note |
6.34%
|
6.36%
|
6.18%
|
- 18 BP
|
2-year Note |
6.24%
|
6.55%
|
6.35%
|
- 20 BP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Prices |
|
|
|
|
DJIA |
11497*
|
10614*
|
10449*
|
- 1.6 %
|
S&P 500 |
1469*
|
1457*
|
1464*
|
+ 0.5 %
|
NASDAQ Composite |
4069*
|
3875*
|
3861*
|
- 0.4%
|
Russell 2000 |
505*
|
523*
|
514*
|
- 1.7 %
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
Rates |
|
|
|
|
Euro/ |
1.0008
|
0.9530
|
0.9658
|
+ 1.3 %
|
Yen/
|
102.40
|
106.83
|
106.31
|
- 0.5 %
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
Prices |
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil ($/barrel) |
$25.60
|
$30.05
|
$32.35
|
+ 7.7 %
|
Gold ($/ounce) |
$289.60
|
$286.50
|
$291.50
|
+ 1.7 %
|
|
|
|
|
|
(BP = basis points; stock
price indices are rounded) |
Housing
starts and retail sales weaken
Housing starts fell 3.9 percent in May to
a 1.592 million-unit rate. This was the third decline in starts in five
months. Clearly, the chart below does reveal that housing starts peaked
in February but have steadily dropped since. Townhouses and apartment
buildings helped boost total construction in the past several months.
The fact is that single-family housing starts peaked in December 1999
and are now at their lowest level since April 1999. Construction of
large apartment complexes can skew the monthly data from time to time.
There is no question that interest rate changes impact single family
construction more dramatically and consistently. Fed officials were
anxious to see if the rate hikes of the past year were causing housing
demand to moderate. And in fact, the rate hikes are having the intended
effect, just with a bit of a lag.
Retail sales dipped 0.3 percent
in May after a downwardly revised drop of 0.6 percent in April. This
was the first two-month decline in retail sales since July and August
1998. In both cases, declines in auto sales were a major factor behind
the drop. Durable goods in general also recorded some weakness. For
instance, sales at building materials and hardware stores fell in five
of the past six months! This goes along with the downward trend in housing
starts. Furniture and appliance store sales also dipped in May for the
first time in six months. Higher interest rates typically hamper durable
goods spending.
Retail sales of nondurable
goods have also weakened considerably these past two months. Nondurables
edged up 0.2 percent in May but edged down 0.1 percent in April. A plunge
in sales at gasoline service stations dampened April sales, but so did
a drop in apparel stores and restaurants. In May, restaurant sales fell
again, and so did spending at grocery stores.
The bottom-line
on the consumer? The retail sales
chart above clearly depicts a decided moderation in the pace of consumer
spending. One could say that a drop in auto sales overstates the weakness,
but the three-month moving average of retail sales shows that the underlying
trend is simply lower than it was several months ago. The Fed’s past
six interest rate hikes are undoubtedly reducing housing demand, leading
to weakness in durable goods such as furniture and appliances.
Higher energy prices have
to be impacting consumer spending as well. When consumers spend a few
cents more per gallon on their weekly fill-up, the extra money going
to gasoline expenditures may not even be noticeable. It could be the
cost of a coke or a candy bar. But gasoline prices have surged in the
past couple of months. The money going to gas is tangible to consumers
– who now have less discretionary income for movies, computer games,
videos, music CDs, etc.
Fed officials certainly would
never admit this, but higher energy prices are bound to choke off some
consumer spending. In addition to higher rates and a rather sluggish
stock market, energy prices may be cooling down the economy this summer.
It is really debatable whether the Fed has completed its tightening
rounds, but lower housing starts coupled with anemic retail sales could
stay the Fed’s hand at the June 27 & 28 FOMC meeting.
Inflation
is the name of the game
The consumer price index edged up 0.1 percent
in May after remaining unchanged in April. Energy prices fell 1.9 percent
for the second straight month. This was unusual – and indeed labeled
as a timing anomaly by the Labor Department. They expect a spurt in
energy prices to show up in June as an offset to the May drop. So be
forewarned that the June CPI figure could be ugly. In May, the year-over-year
rise edged up to 3.1 percent. Even after discounting the temporary blip
from a few months ago, it does look like there is a slight upward trend
in consumer price inflation.
Indeed, the CPI less food
and energy prices increased 0.2 percent – in line with the gains of
the past few months. But the year-over-year rise also edged higher in
May to show a 2.4 percent rise. Yes, we’ve seen worse inflation in 1997
and 1998, but then it was heading down, not up like it is now.
The bottom-line
on inflation? Most analysts, including
Fed officials, view the consumer price index as a lagging indicator
of inflation. That may well be the case, but the CPI data on its own
doesn’t look favorable from the point of view of central bankers whose
primary goal in life is to keep inflationary pressures at bay. At this
point, the slowdown in demand will play a bigger role in the debate
whether to raise rates or not at the June 27 & 28 meeting, but the
CPI data still looms over the heads of Fed officials.
Surprise
growth in production
The index of industrial production rose 0.4
percent in May after larger 0.7 percent gains in the previous two months.
However, the figures were surprisingly strong since the consensus of
economists was calling for a drop of this magnitude in the index, based
on the employment report. Production of consumer goods and construction
supplies did decline for the month. However, business equipment posted
another healthy gain – bringing the year-over-year rise to up 8.7 percent.
If the growth is coming from capital spending, that could help to boost
productivity in the future.
The capacity utilization
rate remained unchanged at 82.1 percent in May, but is significantly
higher than a year ago. Nevertheless, the old rules of thumb suggest
that inflationary pressures begin to develop after the operating rate
hits 83 percent.
THE BOTTOM
LINE
Market players were rewarded with plenty of
economic data this week. Moreover, the bulk of the data suggested that
economic activity might be starting to moderate. One month of weak figures
doesn’t make a trend. But in the case of retail sales and housing starts,
figures have weakened over the past several months. This should reassure
Federal Reserve officials that consumer demand is indeed waning due
to the rate hikes of the past year.
Despite the market-friendly
data this past week, several Fed officials have pointedly commented
that the economy and the potential for inflation remain strong. It is
likely that the Fed tightening rounds may be paused, but aren’t yet
complete. Market players are now centering on the view that the Fed
won’t raise rates in June, but could possibly raise rates in August.
Looking
Ahead: Week of June 19 to June 23
Market News International
compiles this market consensus which surveys about 20 economists each
week.
Tuesday
The consensus shows the international
trade balance on goods and services
is expected to narrow in April to reveal a shortfall of $29.3 billion
compared with a $30.2 billion trade deficit in March. Economists are
predicting small increases in exports and imports.
The federal
budget is predicted to record a
modest deficit of $2 billion in May, much smaller than the deficits
recorded in the previous couple of years for the same month. For the
fiscal year to date, this reflects a surplus of $122 billion compared
with a surplus of less than $41 billion for the same period last year.
Thursday
Market participants are expecting new
jobless claims to decrease 1,000
in the week ended June 17 from last week's 296,000 level. Claims are
likely to be rather volatile in the next several weeks since summer
factory shutdown schedules are not exact from year to year.
|